Get it? Because my name is Mal. And I'm inappropriate.

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Crisis of Crisis

Now, I blame John Mayer for a lot of things: douchebag undergrads sitting under trees and singing insipid love songs on the first day of Spring; increased media coverage of Jessica Simpson; etc. But probably the most offensive thing he has done to me is to introduce the term "quarterlife crisis" into my lexicon. When I was 17 and still young enough to appreciate John Mayer (on a deeper level than everyone else, of course) his song "Why Georgia" was perfect fodder for mid-summer, windows-down, late-night drives. I used to sing the lyrics, "Might be a quarterlife crisis/or just a stirring in my soul" with a naive smile. At 17 I thought the idea of a "quarterlife crisis" was a cute little joke.

Now that I am nearing the age of the "quarterlife," I don't feel the effects of this crisis personally. I don't believe that I should have my entire life nailed down by the age of 25. That thought, in fact, depresses me. But many of my friends seem to believe that they are going through some sort of a crisis that requires the aid of of self-help books. A recent blog post by one of my friends discussing the theme of an approaching (dun dun dun) 24th birthday resulted in a deluge of comments ranging from "I know exactly what you mean," to "Read this book. It really helped me through this tough time."

The book that was sagely recommended is "Quarterlife Crisis: The Unique Challenges of Life in Your Twenties." After a short search on Amazon.com, I found about five books with a similar theme: helping 20-somethings get through their 20-something lives. My problem with these books is they seem to be *creating* a problem rather than *solving* it. Do you have feelings of uneasiness? Are you not totally happy with your job? Are you between 24 and 30? Well you can stop worrying because we have the solution! You are going through a quarter-life crisis! And this book will get you through it!

Aside from the fact that I think all self-help books have minimal to no actual benefit, these books seem especially unnecessary. The first line of "Quarterlife Crisis" reads as follows: "The quest to define ourselves begins during childhood, but when twentysomethings enter the 'real' world, the process can seem to start all over again." Wow. What a progressive idea. As an adult, you are constantly changing and trying to find your place in the world. I hope the rest of the book is as insightful. And it looks like I'm in luck, given the chapter titles: "How Am I Supposed to Figure Out Who I Really Am?" "What if I'm Scared to Stop Being a Kid?" "What If I Fail?" "What Do All of These Doubts Mean?" and my personal favorite, "Can I Carry Any Part of My College Experience into the Real World?"

When did college become a bump in the road on the way to adulthood? Last time I checked, college was supposed to provide a few transitional years between high school and adulthood; the purpose of college, in fact, was to *prepare* people for life after college. Why are we going to college if the skills we learn in it are completely useless? The answer is: we aren't. As much as the writers of these books would like us to believe college campuses exist in some sort of vacuum that have no connection to the outside world, it just isn't true. College is still an institution of preparation where students improve their analytical skills, writing skills, and, outside the classroom, their social skills. After graduation, these twentysomethings have plenty of options and plenty of opportunity. I know because I am one of them. And I find this feeling of possibility rather liberating.

So what makes people of my generation think that there is something fundamentally wrong with them because they don't feel perfectly settled at the absurdly young age of 25? Is it the pressure to be monetarily secure and successful at a young age? Is it the self-help book publishers trying to make money on a previously untapped demographic? Is it based on a sense of guilt that college was just too much fun? Or does it boil down to even larger problems, like the inherent pressure of living in a competitive capitalist society?

I'm sure these are all viable factors, but someone, somewhere along the line decided that a perfectly normal state of liminality needed to be idenitfied, studied, and remedied. I'm guessing it was a twentysomething with a little too much time on his hands, and for that reason, I choose to blame John Mayer.

No comments: